The 1 Security Question Agencies Must Answer
Zero trust at its best is invisible, meaning it doesn’t create barriers for work but rather enhances the user experience through intentional security practices.
Zero trust at its best is invisible, meaning it doesn’t create barriers for work but rather enhances the user experience through intentional security practices.
For 25 years, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has labeled cybersecurity a high risk. But a lot has changed since it made the list in 1997.
So much of our world, our lives, is controlled by software. The delivery of practically all vital public services hinges on trustworthy software.
At face value, one might not associate words like flexibility and seamless with the term zero-trust architecture. It implies that no one or thing is trusted.
There are a lot of misperceptions and myths about zero-trust security. Here are some of the biggest — and why they’re wrong.
Charged with keeping organizations sage, IT teams have focused on preventing and stopping risks. But zero trust security offers a whole new paradigm, one that recognizes the growing need for collaboration.
Security has to be baked into the architecture from the outset, and must extend seamlessly across the operation.
The demand for cyber talent is incredibly high. For government agencies, outsourcing might be a better solution than cultivating in-house experts.
One of the trickiest parts of implementing zero trust is the cultural shift because it requires stakeholder departments and end users to go through more security layers.
The CIS CyberMarket provides state, local, tribal and territorial agencies with the opportunity to leverage collective purchasing power with industry-leading cyber vendors.