Let’s Bust Some Myths About Zero Trust
There are a lot of misperceptions and myths about zero-trust security. Here are some of the biggest — and why they’re wrong.
There are a lot of misperceptions and myths about zero-trust security. Here are some of the biggest — and why they’re wrong.
Charged with keeping organizations sage, IT teams have focused on preventing and stopping risks. But zero trust security offers a whole new paradigm, one that recognizes the growing need for collaboration.
Security has to be baked into the architecture from the outset, and must extend seamlessly across the operation.
The demand for cyber talent is incredibly high. For government agencies, outsourcing might be a better solution than cultivating in-house experts.
One of the trickiest parts of implementing zero trust is the cultural shift because it requires stakeholder departments and end users to go through more security layers.
The CIS CyberMarket provides state, local, tribal and territorial agencies with the opportunity to leverage collective purchasing power with industry-leading cyber vendors.
It takes new strategies and technologies to build systems that work equally well for remote and in-office employees. Here are thoughts on making hybrid work secure and successful.
“Words matter. And how we communicate trust — or a lack of trust — to those in our organizations impacts how people react to and receive the cyber practices and processes we’re advocating for.”
Driven by a range of mandates, federal IT leaders are asking themselves how far along they are on the zero trust learning curve.
Much of good election security is also just good cybersecurity. Lessons learned in recent years point the way to best practices for government at all levels.