I just set up a group on GovLoop called “Government Security Clearances” that I hope can generate interagency discussion about how we as a government grant and uphold clearances to protect sensitive information. Different agencies set different standards for information access and staff conduct and use different resources to conduct background investigations and look into allegations of security breaches. It’s clear that Uncle Sam has a legitimate interest in protecting certain kinds of data and facilities, but the system as it’s currently constituted lends itself to abuse. The problem is that most people don’t focus on that potential (and the unfortunate realities) until they themselves are under a cloud of suspicion. Witness the case of Concerned Foreign Service Officers. Their blog and website have lots of info on the topic, but since many of the group’s members are being investigated by Diplomatic Security (present company excepted, or so I hope!) it is easy to dismiss the very real problems our fragmented security clearance system can create.
Recent Articles on GovLoop
- How AI Can Help Agencies Deliver Better Constituent Experiences
- How Can Agencies Strengthen Their Defense Against Insider Threats?
- Process Automation: The Efficient Alternative to Paper-Based Systems
- Fostering Creativity on Your Team
- How to Shift to a Continuous Modernization Mindset
- How to Build a Better Endpoint Security Strategy
- How Cross-Skilling Can Help Address IT Skills Gaps
- Learn Something New With Our April Online Training LineUp
- Why Network Modernization Tops the IT Agenda
- Digital Transformation: How to Reduce Internet Connectivity Risks
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.