Employees in the federal government are more dissatisfied with their work than ever. And really that’s not shocking. Pay freezes, budget cuts and low morale is making government a difficult place to work.
In fact, the Partnership for Public Service’s annual Best Places to Work survey saw employee satisfaction fall to the lowest numbers since 2003. For a full recap of the results click here.
But there were pockets of real success in government. The National Credit Union, NASA and the FDA all topped the Best Places to Work survey. So what was their secret?
Tom Fox is the Vice President for Leadership and Innovation at the Partnership for Public Service. He Chris Dorobek on the DorobekINSIDER why some agencies saw great success despite strong headwinds.
Follow the Success
NCUA Chairman Debbie Matz met with employees in every office, held quarterly webinars to surface and answer employees’ questions and concerns, and launched a weekly newsletter to keep employees informed about staffing changes and other internal matters on a week-to-week basis. Through these communications vehicles, leaders learned that NCUA’s procedures were holding back qualified examiners from becoming principal examiners. The agency made several changes to improve the process to ensure consistency and fairness among all employees.
The OCFO also worked to develop a first-class recruiting, hiring and retention program, including 30-day milestones, peer and senior mentoring, and regular check-ins with senior leaders. Senior leaders also focused on improving customer service to internal and external partners, expecting that these efforts will lead to real-time performance and results.
I’ll give you one example: scheduling conference rooms. It sounds silly, but employees were frustrated by the time wasted finding available rooms. Agency leaders took the feedback seriously and developed a new online scheduling process. Of course, it takes more than just putting out fires. DOT is focused on the long term as well, training all first-line supervisors in the core competencies of effective leadership. Significantly, it also includes in all career and political executive performance plans a standard that requires the executives to demonstrate specific actions they have taken to engage with their employees.