To Increase Agility, Reduce the Complexity of IT Services
These days, agencies must provide services more quickly, effectively and securely, using a zero-trust approach. Strong cybersecurity doesn’t have to be complicated, though.
These days, agencies must provide services more quickly, effectively and securely, using a zero-trust approach. Strong cybersecurity doesn’t have to be complicated, though.
Government technology leaders need to know about new cybersecurity threats, opportunities, executive orders, and other challenges. Here’s how one government expert sees the landscape taking shape.
Zero trust would combat two of today’s greatest security challenges: increased endpoints driven by telework and the misuse of privileged credentials.
In a perfect world, cybersecurity isn’t restrictive. You read that right.
Zero trust’s fundamental concepts have been around a long time and are here to stay (even if the buzzwords change).
The belief that the government should treat all of its data and services as if they were exposed to the public internet might sound extreme.
Zero trust at its best is invisible, meaning it doesn’t create barriers for work but rather enhances the user experience through intentional security practices.
So much of our world, our lives, is controlled by software. The delivery of practically all vital public services hinges on trustworthy software.
At face value, one might not associate words like flexibility and seamless with the term zero-trust architecture. It implies that no one or thing is trusted.
There are a lot of misperceptions and myths about zero-trust security. Here are some of the biggest — and why they’re wrong.